With the craze that surrounded Harry Potter and all things magical, the BBC decided to publish a 'Top 100' list as part of their 'Big Read'. The book was supposed to indicate books that everyone should read, however I found the list quite erroneous (how can all 7 Harry Potter books make the fold). Judge for yourself:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/top100.shtml
Anyway, I found this list on the Guardian and deem it far more comprehensive and, in my personal taste, correct:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/may/08/books.booksnews
Here's a few notes, please disagree:
Firstly, the list is less suffocating as it hasn't numbered the entries, this allows the reader slightly more freedom in discerning for themselves where each entry should lie.
It dates well, whereas the BBC version was slightly compact and overly modern, the Guardian is far more ubiquitous and rounded.
A problem with the Guardians version, is that it has 'complete works', which feels obvious and contrived. After all, Kafka's best book is not his 'complete works'. Quite stupid really.
That's about all, as a side-note, Crime and Punishment shouldn't be in either. It's overrated. (Sorry)
Showing posts with label Swann's Way. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Swann's Way. Show all posts
Sunday, 3 June 2012
Top 100 Books
Labels:
9/11,
Adorno,
America,
Culture,
Don DeLillo,
Douglas Adam,
Jack Kerouac,
Jonathan Safran Foer,
Kafka,
Literature,
Love,
Marcel Proust,
poetry,
Proust,
Swann's Way,
The Beat Generation,
Top 100 Books,
Twilight,
Writing
Wednesday, 30 May 2012
Marcel Proust – Swann’s Way (Part One of Remembrance of Things Past)
Marcel Proust’s masterpiece Remembrance of Things Past, or In
Search of Lost Time, is renowned for both its size (3500 pages) and it’s
seemingly effortless prose. I began part one, entitled Swann’s Way, this week with very little information about the
author, and indeed the novel itself, and was pleasantly surprised from the
first page. The vocabulary is exquisite and the prose itself is perhaps the
most diligent and fastidious I have ever encountered, in the sense that it is
difficult but ever-so rewarding.
This may seem slightly hyperbolic, but it really is
marvellous. And while I am evidently drawing particular attention to these few
pages, I certainly have no criticisms of the rest of the book, as it follows,
more or less, in the same fashion.
What is so wonderful about the book is that the plot is
noticeably ordinary. There is little action, very few likeable characters and
the technique of ‘involuntary memory’ which is employed, doesn’t offer the
reader intense emotion or collective tragedy, but this in itself is irrelevant.
In fact, all this stands as a testament to the beauty of Proust’s work. From an
outside perspective, to describe what the book is about, all 500 pages of this
first part, would surely defer readers, as very little actually happens, but
this certainly should not be the case. Proust is a superb author, and the mildness
and vapidity of the text actually complements the brilliant writing. It is
slow, and at times difficult, but all this serves to highlight the sheer virtuosity of Proust’s work.It is exceptionally colourful and descriptive, and for such
a seemingly ordinary storyline it has a way of truly encapsulating its readership.
This book is quite distinctive. If anything, it reminds me
slightly of Nikolai Gogol’s Dead Souls,
the comparison being that Gogol’s plot was seemingly ordinary yet still truly captivating,
only Proust’s work is missing the element of intrigue that was so evident in
Gogol’s magnum opus. These comparisons are small, Proust's work is undoubtedly unique.
After 500 pretty laborious pages, I have bought the second
part of this 7 part classic, and quite look forward to reading it in due course.
I would advise anyone to read this book; it is, quite simply, remarkable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)